Comments on Stephen Carter's Lecture
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comments by Stephen Parrott on “ Weak measurements just got stronger ”
I wasn’t able to follow all of the Popescu article in detail due to undefined symbols. I sent a message to the Internet newsgroup sci.physics.research quoting the part for which I couldn’t think of a sensible interpretation and asking if anyone could. As of this writing, no one has responded, but in the meantime, I thought of a way to define the symbols which would at least make sense. But unde...
متن کاملNachdiplom Lecture: Statistics Meets Optimization Some Comments on Relative Costs
Directly solving the ordinary least squares problem will (in general) require O(nd) operations. From Table 5.1, the Gaussian sketch does not actually improve upon this scaling for unconstrained problems: when m d (as is needed in the unconstrained case), then computing the sketch SA requires O(nd) operations as well. If we compute sketches using the JLT, then this cost is reduced to O(nd log(d)...
متن کاملComments on Robert Langland ’ s Lecture : “ Endoscopy and Beyond ”
Below I have put into writing my thoughts in connection with your lecture “Endoscopy and Beyond”† and especially the Section called “a pipe dream”. Also I have tried to digest your more recent letters and numerical experiment and I address at least some of the points that you raise in the last section. There are no doubt a number of inaccuracies below but I think most of them are good approxima...
متن کاملComments of Stephen Parrott on “ A derivation of quantum theory from physical requirements ”
The most important of the following comments points out what I suspected might be an essential error in the proof of Theorem 2 of the commented paper of the title. A draft had been sent to the authors. After no substantive replies had been received, I posted it on my website, www.math.umb.edu/ sp. The circumstances are more fully described in Section 5. Since then, the authors have replied and ...
متن کاملCritical thinking about the origin of AIDS Comments on Stephen Jenkins’ account
Stephen H. Jenkins, in his book Tools for Critical Thinking in Biology, includes a section titled “Peer review and the origin of AIDS.” In it, he analyses two main theories about the origin of AIDS, the cut-hunter and the polio-vaccine hypotheses. He also draws on and comments on my social science studies of the origin-of-AIDS dispute. Critical thinking is worthwhile in nearly every field of sc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: California Law Review
سال: 1999
ISSN: 0008-1221
DOI: 10.2307/3481037